PROVO — Growing up with a father whose passion was English, literature and poetry, there was not a day that I did not hear a quote from one of William Shakespeare’s plays escape his well-versed lips. BYU’s latest production of As You Like It with a modern twist really did not fit with my expectations for Shakespeare. Whether or not that is a bad thing will be interesting to hear from other audience members.
It is a classic tale of woman loves man, is denied the chance to be with him, and does something drastic so they can be together. In this case, Rosalind, the leading female role and daughter of Duke Senior, decides she will dress like a man and flee into the forest, bringing her cousin, Ceilia, the daughter of Duke Frederick with her. Before this “change,” Rosalind has fallen madly in love with Orlando, Sir Rowland De Bois’ son, which plays a major role in the reason for the runaway. Along the way, Rosalind, now disguised as Ganymede, finds her love Orlando, who obviously believes her to be a man and, in order to be sure of his utter devotion for her, puts him through several tests.
Brigham Young University’s Department of Theatre and Media Arts produces several plays each year and it seems that at least one of the slots is given to Shakespeare. Director Kymberly Mellen had the daunting task of presenting the Bard and chose to combine the classic text with several modern influences.
Using his traditionally splendid tongue, Shakespeare set As You Like It in his own present-day Eastern Europe. Mellen took the next step and, according to the program, “the production [is] therefore set in modern times and treats issues of revolution, refugee communities, and political exile.” Throughout the play, the use of contemporary music, costumes and language “makes this production both faithful to Shakespeare’s pastoral romance and relevant to our times of political upheaval.”
I want to focus on the music in this production for a moment. As You Like It has more songs than any other of Shakespeare’s plays and Mellen made sure her cast stayed true to this fact. The program for this BYU production had a page where all of the songs were listed in a playlist. A few of my favorite songs in the production were “I’ll Follow You into the Dark” by Death Cab for Cutie and “The Chain” by Ingrid Michaelson. Although the music was great and it tied in the modern theme simply but splendidly, I did not feel that it really served a purpose in moving the overall action of the individual scenes.
Granted, I attended the first dress rehearsal so it is likely the production has since become much stronger and more fluid. But in this performance I felt like the actors did not know how to transition from scene to scene and relied too heavily on the music to make that happen. During the scenes themselves, the actors also felt a little awkward with their lines and how to put the emotion Shakespeare intended his words to have.
The technical elements saved the show. Lighting designer Michael Handley was brilliant. There was one scene where Duke Frederick (Bradley Moss) was trying to get information from two captives. The only lighting in the scene came from single lights above, but it created columns of light, which made me think the scene occurred underground, in a dungeon maybe. Sound designer Sarah Nasson helped to solidify the mood with the sound of dripping water.
The background noises in several scenes such as: helicopters circling above, a crowd at the wrestling match, owls hooting in the forest and stream running placidly through the campsite, made me feel like I was actually at the match, or in the forest.
There was quite a bit of fighting in this play and every punch, kick and body slam was so fake and really brought the level of acting down in the scenes. I understand that stage combat is difficult and I commend the actors for spending hours learning these different moves, but in the end, I do not think they were achieving the realism they were hoping for.
As in many of Shakespeare’s plays, love is a key element in every scene and the same holds true in As You Like It. As mentioned, there were many elements that made this play feel like a mere play, but I felt like Rosalind (Ashley Bonner) and Orlando (Ben Isaacs)’s love for each other brought that sense of truth back into the play.
There were many memorable characters in this play, and it may be silly for me to say, but I felt as if the forest babies and the children were some of the best actors. They followed all of their cues and I really enjoyed their raw honesty and charisma. They were my favorite actors and their presence, along with the BYU students and older actors, created a real sense of a community theater production, which I appreciated. The combined ages brought the comedy to life.
“It is important to remember that this story is billed in anthologies and in our mid as a comedy. It fits that genre in many ways” Zach Archuleta, the dramaturg said. “There is a joyous wedding at the end. But we will have to travel through a dark and bitter forest as well as a blooming and hopeful one to see it.”
As You Like It plays through April 2nd (Tue-Sat) at 7:30 PM with Saturday matinees. Performances take place in the Pardoe Drama Theatre of the Harris Fine Arts Center on the campus of BYU. Tickets are $8-15 and are available by phone (801-422-4322) or online at BYUArts.com.
Questions to our Readers
- Do you agree or disagree with the above review?
- What dangers do you have to address when modernizing a classic?
- What benefits have you seen in adapted works?
Good review; I’m going to see the show this week. I’m curious to see how, exactly the songs are used–are they generally as transitions between scenes? Are they sung by the actors in the middle of scenes, replacing some of the songs in the original play? I think that could be interesting. One thing I love so much about “As You Like It” is its pastoral comedy approach–there’s a lot of just hanging out in the forest, and some of the best scenes (and songs) really don’t advance the plot, I think. I think it’s hard to successfully “modernize” Shakespeare, and I’m curious to see how the production itself goes. The actors in the show I know I generally like–Ashley Bonner is particularly brilliant, and I’m glad to see her cast as Rosalind. Anyways, one of my favorite Shakespeare plays.
I agree with Ms Keller on most of this review. The technical aspects of this production are phenomenal. The younger actors also add a vitality and authenticity to the show that really makes it unique.
I disagree with her in regards to the songs. Aristotle noted many years ago in The Poetics that music is one of the key elements of theatre. The question now becomes what is the use of that music? In opera music is what drives the story a long in a very literal sense, but in a modern broadway setting music is used less to progress a story and more to emphasize a certain character, feeling, or moment. The songs in As You Like It may not drive the play forward but they are beautiful inward reflections of the circumstances being seen on stage as well as magnificent tools that invite the audience into the story itself. Music is a powerful force and this production uses that power well.
I think most of this is fair. However, if there’s one thing about this production that has been consistently celebrated, it’s the actor’s understanding of the language. This is the first I’ve heard “awkward.” Do you care to be more specific? Expecially considering that you mention “memorable characters” and Ben Isaccs and Ashley Bonner’s convincing romance. Were they awkward, but also convincing? Help me out here.
Davey–
All of the songs in this production are modern songs from modern artists. They are used primarily for transitions, yes. Ashley did do a wonderful job, and I think she was perfect for the role. Enjoy!
Patches–
I agree with you that music can be what makes or breaks a production. I did not mean for the review to sound as if I did not like the songs. I, like you, thought they were all beautiful songs and perfect for the circumstances they were portraying. I just thought that there were too many songs, and there were a few that did not totally fit. But I appreciate your comments and am so glad you enjoyed the play.
Rach–
I do not know about you, but I guess I am just an awkward person. Yes, the love was convincing, but at the start of any relationship, everything is awkward, do you not think? I apologize if you were confused. Everyone is different in how they perceive things and I guess we just perceived them in a different light.
Thank you for your comments, Rach.
I heard a good number of wary reviews of the show before attending last Saturday. Thankfully, I was very pleasantly surprised by the production.
First off, Kris Paries really complimented the show amazingly well with his guitar and additional musical numbers. I thought that Director Kym Mellon’s choice of adding modern colors through the music choice and costuming was exciting.
Admittedly, yes, there were weak acting moments. But there were also some real strong ones as well. Personally I felt the grand majority of the cast had a firm understanding of the script and the story being shared. I had no trouble connecting with their performances.
The whole experience felt a little Bohemian to me. I felt I was in the basement of some building where a bunch of artists had gathered to share the text of AS YOU LIKE IT because they personally felt there was something very important and applicable in the text. They then shared their production through the modes they new best.
I really liked the whole contemporary feel. I’ve never seen the political setting brought out so well. And while yes, transitions were choppy at times, and moments in the play didn’t quite feel consistent with the rest of it (moments that were chosen to talk to the audience, etc.) it was fun. I was never bored. And I actually really liked the stage combat.
Definitely PG-13. And you should definitely not go into this show expecting Shakespeare’s AS YOU LIKE IT. Head in expecting to see a show based on AYLI and be open to where you’ll be taken.
Lots of fun. Visually stunning.
(apologies for the long disjointed review, but this is a comment afterall)
Thanks for your response Hailey! 🙂
Of course, Patches. 😉
■Do you agree or disagree with the above review?
I thought the music was not at all distracting, but actually brought the concept completely to life. Lots of folks try to simply place a Shakespeare show in a modern setting but nothing changes but the costumes. The music was the element that made this show work. I was also VERY impressed with how aware every cast member was off the language they were using. I was never lost. I felt the audience followed everything. Indeed, there are weaker and stronger acting moments, but overall, it’s a very solid piece. So, I’m going to disagree.
■What dangers do you have to address when modernizing a classic?
Kinda summed this up before. Sometimes you can lose the meanings, but I felt this adaptation brought new light to messages that are more subtle in the original text. I’m very familiar with this play, and this version made me re-think it completely. That is not a good thing, but a WONDERFUL thing. Kudos.
■What benefits have you seen in adapted works?
I see them differently. I realize that art is about interpretation. I learn something. I walk away with a new perspective on not only the show, but on life through the messages it presents and adapts.
This is the director of As You Like It. Thank you for coming to see the show and for each of your varied viewpoints. I appreciate you caring enough to take the time to post a commment, favorable or not. Theatre is to provoke discussion, not agreement necessarily – so all responses are valid. Hope to see you there!
I really liked the concept of this show; it was well thought out and I think quite a few things worked well, while many others did not. I feel overall it lacked cohesion and polish. The music was fun and engaging, though it often, as the review points out, does not further the action. (With the exception of the death cab song: it was awkwardly placed and I couldn’t tell weather it was suppose to serious or sort of a joke? It was also the first song sung by a member of the cast without guitar accompaniment, so I don’t think we knew, as an audience, that this too was part of the musical world of the play.) Anyway, all that being said–Ashley’s performance was AMAZING! If you go for nothing else go to see her in the role! She was truly in her element up there, it was a delight to see!
Yeah, I agree that there were a lot of pretty great things in the show, as well as a lot of things that didn’t work. I think if as much focus has been given to the language itself as everything else, that that could have unified everything into something pretty amazing. Definitely very well worth seeing though. I love the idea of using contemporary songs in place of the songs written into the text. This is one of my very favorite plays.
We saw this on Saturday and actually really enjoyed it. The modern adaptation was consistent and was effect, bizarre as it is. The performers were also quite worthy of praise. As has been said, Ashley Bonner was sensational as Rosalind. I also thought Ben Isaacs was quite dreamy as Orlando. What really gave the show its legs though, were the supporting performances. Graham Ward was brilliant as Touchstone, Rachel Baird was a compelling and bewitching Phebe, we loved the cowboy take on Corin, Duke Frederick had a great authoratative presence, and even Le Beau was convincingly and powerfully played with guts and a convincing torture scene.